ECNL Club Rankings

After week 2:

…………………………… PPG Pts GP W T L GF GA GD
1. Dallas Texans.... ECNL 2.50 45 18 14 3 1 43 7 36
2. Sting……………...ECNL 2.20 33 15 9 6 0 43 13 30
3. D'Feeters…….….ECNL 1.50 15 10 4 3 3 12 8 4
4. Lonestar………...ECNL 1.38 18 13 5 3 5 25 16 9
5. FC Dallas………..ECNL 1.36 19 14 5 4 5 18 27 -9
6. TSC Hurricane.....ECNL 1.35 27 20 8 3 9 35 40 -5
7. Challenge SC…...ECNL 0.93 13 14 3 4 7 21 28 -7
8. Rush……………...ECNL 0.87 13 15 4 1 10 13 46 -33
9. Albion………….....ECNL 0.70 14 20 3 5 12 15 32 -17
10. Solar……………...ECNL 0.40 2 5 0 2 3 3 11 -8

You kind of forgot to mention the age group.

Lawnboy wrote:You kind of forgot to mention the age group.

No, it looks like the combined from all the ECNL Teams in the Texas Conference..

soccersounder wrote:

Lawnboy wrote:You kind of forgot to mention the age group.

No, it looks like the combined from all the ECNL Teams in the Texas Conference..

Which at this point (2 Weeks in) means absolutely nothing, except for bragging rights for some parents.....

Pele98 wrote:

soccersounder wrote:

Lawnboy wrote:You kind of forgot to mention the age group.

No, it looks like the combined from all the ECNL Teams in the Texas Conference..

Which at this point (2 Weeks in) means absolutely nothing, except for bragging rights for some parents.....

Well, at least it shows us 99 parents that Feet are still relevent............

Just a joke

soccerstand wrote:After week 2:

…………………………… PPG Pts GP W T L GF GA GD
1. Dallas Texans.... ECNL 2.50 45 18 14 3 1 43 7 36
2. Sting……………...ECNL 2.20 33 15 9 6 0 43 13 30
3. D'Feeters…….….ECNL 1.50 15 10 4 3 3 12 8 4
4. Lonestar………...ECNL 1.38 18 13 5 3 5 25 16 9
5. FC Dallas………..ECNL 1.36 19 14 5 4 5 18 27 -9
6. TSC Hurricane.....ECNL 1.35 27 20 8 3 9 35 40 -5
7. Challenge SC…...ECNL 0.93 13 14 3 4 7 21 28 -7
8. Rush……………...ECNL 0.87 13 15 4 1 10 13 46 -33
9. Albion………….....ECNL 0.70 14 20 3 5 12 15 32 -17
10. Solar……………...ECNL 0.40 2 5 0 2 3 3 11 -8

Look at the Games Played column: Texans 18, Sting 15, Feet 10, FC 14 and Solar 5. All in the first two weeks?

soccersounder wrote:

Pele98 wrote:

soccersounder wrote:

Lawnboy wrote:You kind of forgot to mention the age group.

No, it looks like the combined from all the ECNL Teams in the Texas Conference..

Which at this point (2 Weeks in) means absolutely nothing, except for bragging rights for some parents.....

Well, at least it shows us 99 parents that Feet are still relevent............

Just a joke

Hmm, I would think that in the game of Soccer, feet would be relevant if not downright essential!

AbEnd wrote:

soccerstand wrote:After week 2:

…………………………… PPG Pts GP W T L GF GA GD
1. Dallas Texans.... ECNL 2.50 45 18 14 3 1 43 7 36
2. Sting……………...ECNL 2.20 33 15 9 6 0 43 13 30
3. D'Feeters…….….ECNL 1.50 15 10 4 3 3 12 8 4
4. Lonestar………...ECNL 1.38 18 13 5 3 5 25 16 9
5. FC Dallas………..ECNL 1.36 19 14 5 4 5 18 27 -9
6. TSC Hurricane.....ECNL 1.35 27 20 8 3 9 35 40 -5
7. Challenge SC…...ECNL 0.93 13 14 3 4 7 21 28 -7
8. Rush……………...ECNL 0.87 13 15 4 1 10 13 46 -33
9. Albion………….....ECNL 0.70 14 20 3 5 12 15 32 -17
10. Solar……………...ECNL 0.40 2 5 0 2 3 3 11 -8

Look at the Games Played column: Texans 18, Sting 15, Feet 10, FC 14 and Solar 5. All in the first two weeks?

exactly.... Texans have played more games than everyone else. It is very early in the season, and not much to be gleaned from these numbers right now.

Silly me for not paying closer attention.

InaB wrote:

soccersounder wrote:

Pele98 wrote:

soccersounder wrote:

Lawnboy wrote:You kind of forgot to mention the age group.

No, it looks like the combined from all the ECNL Teams in the Texas Conference..

Which at this point (2 Weeks in) means absolutely nothing, except for bragging rights for some parents.....

Well, at least it shows us 99 parents that Feet are still relevent............

Just a joke

Hmm, I would think that in the game of Soccer, feet would be relevant if not downright essential!

soccerstand wrote:

D'Feeters	5	88	4	24.8/1	6	14.7/1	2	2%	2	40%
Hurricanes	5	90	4	25.2/1	4	22.5/1	2	2%	1	20%
Sting	5	98	3	35.6/1	5	19.6/1	8	8%	4	80%
Solar	5	91	2	47.0/1	4	22.8/1	2	2%	1	20%
Rush	5	91	2	48.2/1	4	22.8/1	5	5%	2	40%
FC Dallas	5	102	2	52.8/1	5	20.4/1	12	12%	5	100%
Albion	5	107	2	56.0/1	2	53.5/1	13	12%	5	100%
Challenge	5	92	2	61.6/1	5	18.4/1	5	5%	3	60%
Lonestar	5	93	1	93.0/1	2	46.5/1	4	4%	2	40%
Texans	5	100	1	100.0/1	4	25.0/1	10	10%	3	60%
	______	______	______	______	______	______	______	______	______	______
Texas Division Totals	50	952	23	51.9/1	41	25.1/1	63	7%	28	56%
Description	Number of ECNL Teams	Total ECNL Players	Total ECNL Head Coaches	Player To Head Coach Ratio	Total Of All Coaches	Player To All Coaches Ratio	Number of Players Above 18 Player Limit	Percent of Total Players Above Limit	Teams Above 18 Player Limit	Percent of ECNL Teams Above Limit

I hate to assume.. So what's your point??

95 Texans are coached by Hassan except for games.

okay that that explains why they are on the bottom of the list

go99 wrote:okay that that explains why they are on the bottom of the list

Bottom of what list? Surely not the standings.

U16 ECNL Rankings

I would like to propose that the ECNL clubs play for a much more valuable prize than those boring college scholarships. I propose that we come up with an award for the top performing club. Let's call it the "Texas Cleat Award". Hopefully that name hasn't already been used. So the Texas Division ECNL club that finishes the 2012 - 2013 season in first place will get the "Texas Cleat Award". What do you think? Here are the standings after 6 weeks:

All Texas ECNL Combined Club (U18s-U14s)
Texas Conference Standings
…………………………… PPG Pts GP W T L GF GA GD
1. Dallas Texans.... ECNL 2.38 69 29 21 6 2 65 16 49
2. Sting……………...ECNL 2.25 63 28 18 9 1 74 22 52
3. Lonestar………...ECNL 1.82 51 28 14 9 5 50 23 27
4. FC Dallas………..ECNL 1.38 33 24 9 6 9 33 40 -7
5. TSC Hurricane.....ECNL 1.27 38 30 11 5 14 49 58 -9
6. D'Feeters…….….ECNL 1.12 37 33 10 7 16 39 47 -8
7. Albion………….....ECNL 1.03 40 39 10 10 19 33 64 -31
8. Challenge SC…...ECNL 0.92 22 24 5 7 12 27 41 -14
9. Rush……………...ECNL 0.88 30 34 8 6 20 33 77 -44
10. Solar……………...ECNL 0.59 10 17 1 7 9 18 33 -15

Uncle Numanga wrote:

go99 wrote:okay that that explains why they are on the bottom of the list

Bottom of what list? Surely not the standings.

got something for you go99....BOOM ROASTED!

I would be the first to say HN can win games. He just can't teach you how to play. Which is supposed to be the reason for the ECNL

go99 wrote:

I would be the first to say HN can win games. He just can't teach you how to play. Which is supposed to be the reason for the ECNL

Hmm, sounds like your EPL team!

hey thats over the line. Where is the moderator?

go99 wrote:

I would be the first to say HN can win games. He just can't teach you how to play. Which is supposed to be the reason for the ECNL

You've never been to one of his practices have you? Some of the best my dd has had, hard but worthwhile.

I think you're talking out of the wrong orifice.

Uncle Numanga wrote:

go99 wrote:

I would be the first to say HN can win games. He just can't teach you how to play. Which is supposed to be the reason for the ECNL

You've never been to one of his practices have you? Some of the best my dd has had, hard but worthwhile.

I think you're talking out of the wrong orifice.

True I have not been to one of his girls practices, My experience is on;y from things on the boys side

go99 wrote:

I would be the first to say HN can win games. He just can't teach you how to play. Which is supposed to be the reason for the ECNL

Where is Charlie Sheen when you need him . . . WINNING!