North Texas Soccer Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Log in

I forgot my password

Be An Athletic Supporter!
Donate and get this nifty tag!

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Pixel
Statistics
We have 15040 registered users
The newest registered user is Zoonwen

Our users have posted a total of 203400 messages in 30815 subjects

If the 05's qualified this year

Page 4 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by tpitty 12/08/14, 03:29 pm

Like...stick around because he is getting an older team, or stick around to watch this one grow up? --cause I kinda wanted the preview.

tpitty
TxSoccer Sponsor
TxSoccer Sponsor

Posts : 423
Join date : 2010-07-29

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by TatonkaBurger 12/08/14, 03:39 pm

Seven wrote:Garrett has an 00 D1 team

Thanks for clarifying Seven.  I didnt know if it was Aaron or Melissa.
TatonkaBurger
TatonkaBurger
TxSoccer Addict
TxSoccer Addict

Posts : 1176
Points : 4446
Join date : 2012-12-03

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Seven 12/08/14, 04:02 pm

No problem. I am just here to help Wink
Seven
Seven
TxSoccer Author
TxSoccer Author

Posts : 533
Points : 4981
Join date : 2010-01-11

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by banana kick 13/08/14, 06:51 am

tpitty wrote:Like...stick around because he is getting an older team, or stick around to watch this one grow up? --cause I kinda wanted the preview.

Watching this one grow up might have to do. I agree, though, it'll be fun to see it when it happens.
banana kick
banana kick
TxSoccer Postmaster
TxSoccer Postmaster

Posts : 178
Points : 3184
Join date : 2013-08-06

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by banana kick 13/08/14, 07:02 am

TatonkaBurger wrote:
Lakedad wrote:
TatonkaBurger wrote:
tpitty wrote:
thunderlipz wrote:Big question is are these coaches mentioned even going to take their respective teams select? I would guess Pulp & Farley will, but Drake & Scarfone are known for passing their teams off.

Not sure of the relevance?  

I thought this topic was about what it would look like if the 05s qualified this year.  If that was the case, history tells us that Drake & Scarfone would not be coaching in this age group.  That's relevant.

Doesn't the same apply to D'feeters?  Colon doesn't have any Select teams does he?

I don't know each of these coach's histories but it looks like Drake, Diaz, Colon, Arnold, Parsons, Voutier, Garrett, and Scarfone only have academy level teams and no select teams.  Have any of them had one in the past?

I believe Drake has a PPL league team this year, and both Garrett, recently, and Scarfone, a few years ago, have been in LH.

Whether or not the coaches listed here have select teams this year, I anticipate all of them, perhaps with Skip being the exception, will be guiding teams into select next year.

I wish them all good luck!
banana kick
banana kick
TxSoccer Postmaster
TxSoccer Postmaster

Posts : 178
Points : 3184
Join date : 2013-08-06

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Guest 14/08/14, 01:42 am

To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted. If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams, and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select. And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period. Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time. Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense. If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so? And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by TatonkaBurger 14/08/14, 08:42 am

Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.
TatonkaBurger
TatonkaBurger
TxSoccer Addict
TxSoccer Addict

Posts : 1176
Points : 4446
Join date : 2012-12-03

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Lakedad 14/08/14, 01:17 pm

TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.

On the contrary, I'm a big believer in allowing academy players the opportunity to guest with other teams.  1. It provides extra touches and allows the player to work on their individual skill and 2. it provides the parents valuable insight into other teams coaches and parents.  

In this year leading up to select, we often see shakeups as players move, kids get cut and teams fold.  There are a number of variables that can lead your kid to be looking in from the outside.  Having a couple of teams you could go to and be happy is not a bad thing.  Everyone should have a backup plan!  Even if it is spending more time on the lake  Very Happy
Lakedad
Lakedad
TxSoccer Postmaster
TxSoccer Postmaster

Posts : 359
Points : 3659
Join date : 2012-10-21
Location : Lake today? I can't, my kid has soccer.

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Guest 14/08/14, 01:28 pm

Lakedad wrote:
TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.

On the contrary, I'm a big believer in allowing academy players the opportunity to guest with other teams.  1. It provides extra touches and allows the player to work on their individual skill and 2. it provides the parents valuable insight into other teams coaches and parents.  

In this year leading up to select, we often see shakeups as players move, kids get cut and teams fold.  There are a number of variables that can lead your kid to be looking in from the outside.  Having a couple of teams you could go to and be happy is not a bad thing.  Everyone should have a backup plan!  Even if it is spending more time on the lake  Very Happy

My point is, guest players should be at the end of the bench. Not starting on the field ahead of the full time players. It's wrong. And it's indefensible.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by TatonkaBurger 14/08/14, 01:34 pm

Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Lakedad wrote:
TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.

On the contrary, I'm a big believer in allowing academy players the opportunity to guest with other teams.  1. It provides extra touches and allows the player to work on their individual skill and 2. it provides the parents valuable insight into other teams coaches and parents.  

In this year leading up to select, we often see shakeups as players move, kids get cut and teams fold.  There are a number of variables that can lead your kid to be looking in from the outside.  Having a couple of teams you could go to and be happy is not a bad thing.  Everyone should have a backup plan!  Even if it is spending more time on the lake  Very Happy

My point is, guest players should be at the end of the bench. Not starting on the field ahead of the full time players. It's wrong.  And it's indefensible.  

It sounds like you really need to find a new team for your DD.

I disagree with using guest players only to win but completely agree with the recruiting aspect of guesting for a team and all of the benefits to the kids that LakeDad mentioned.
TatonkaBurger
TatonkaBurger
TxSoccer Addict
TxSoccer Addict

Posts : 1176
Points : 4446
Join date : 2012-12-03

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Lakedad 14/08/14, 01:45 pm

TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Lakedad wrote:
TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.

On the contrary, I'm a big believer in allowing academy players the opportunity to guest with other teams.  1. It provides extra touches and allows the player to work on their individual skill and 2. it provides the parents valuable insight into other teams coaches and parents.  

In this year leading up to select, we often see shakeups as players move, kids get cut and teams fold.  There are a number of variables that can lead your kid to be looking in from the outside.  Having a couple of teams you could go to and be happy is not a bad thing.  Everyone should have a backup plan!  Even if it is spending more time on the lake  Very Happy

My point is, guest players should be at the end of the bench. Not starting on the field ahead of the full time players. It's wrong.  And it's indefensible.  

It sounds like you really need to find a new team for your DD.

I disagree with using guest players only to win but completely agree with the recruiting aspect of guesting for a team and all of the benefits to the kids that LakeDad mentioned.

It's tough to watch your kid sitting on the bench when the coach is starting the guest players. But if we are being honest, the coach is trying to make the team better and if that coach feels the current roster isn't going to get them where they want the team to be, the coach will roll out the red carpet to recruit players they feel are more athletic or developed. Not the sunny side of sports, but all do it.


Last edited by Lakedad on 14/08/14, 01:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Lakedad
Lakedad
TxSoccer Postmaster
TxSoccer Postmaster

Posts : 359
Points : 3659
Join date : 2012-10-21
Location : Lake today? I can't, my kid has soccer.

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Guest 14/08/14, 01:52 pm

TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Lakedad wrote:
TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.

On the contrary, I'm a big believer in allowing academy players the opportunity to guest with other teams.  1. It provides extra touches and allows the player to work on their individual skill and 2. it provides the parents valuable insight into other teams coaches and parents.  

In this year leading up to select, we often see shakeups as players move, kids get cut and teams fold.  There are a number of variables that can lead your kid to be looking in from the outside.  Having a couple of teams you could go to and be happy is not a bad thing.  Everyone should have a backup plan!  Even if it is spending more time on the lake  Very Happy

My point is, guest players should be at the end of the bench. Not starting on the field ahead of the full time players. It's wrong.  And it's indefensible.  

It sounds like you really need to find a new team for your DD.

I disagree with using guest players only to win but completely agree with the recruiting aspect of guesting for a team and all of the benefits to the kids that LakeDad mentioned.

Done.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by garageoffice 14/08/14, 03:33 pm

Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

My understanding was that the DTS Red team was a new splinter off the main DTS 05 team and didn't have enough players for a full team in the spring, so they borrowed some players.  However, if the borrowed players were playing ahead of the actual team members, I take your point.  Now, though, I think they have enough to play without borrowing.  It should be interesting to see how they do on their own with a newly formed group.

garageoffice
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 25
Points : 2836
Join date : 2014-02-14

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Ev23 14/08/14, 03:53 pm

Lakedad wrote:
TatonkaBurger wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:To me, the rankings are crap, as long as guest players are permitted.  If you take 2 or 3 of the best girls from Pulp, Diaz, Adames coached teams,  and play them on numerous games for a lower ranked team (say below 30) -- that lower ranked team will find itself in the top 25. That's what happened to the PAL U9 winners this year. Almost every game featured top players from Adames, and even one top player from Sting Diaz team.  

Given what I have seen between time at DTS and FC Storm, We should stop fooling ourselves to think academy is truly academy around here. It is just another word for select.  And if it is select, it's time to lock the rosters down in league play - period.  Start rewarding the full time players on your roster.... not the subs and guest players with play time.  Or is it really academy?

Some coaches are all about winning, and winning alone. There is no loyalty to the kids that are full time rostered to their teams --- they get 5-10 minutes of play in favor of the guest/part time elite players, all in the name of winning, and at the full time players' expense.  If this age group is not yet truly 'select', then why are so many coaches running it as so?  And any coach that tells you that your kid should only be playing soccer, and is not flexible towards your son/daughter playing other sports that they excel at does NOT have your child's best interest at heart. Period.

If you don't like the way a coach runs his team, go find a new team.  There are a lot out there.  And yes, this is academy so fluid rosters, flexibility and guest players are the name of the game.  I'm not a huge fan of it either, but it is allowed, and so it happens.  But not every coach does it so find one that doesn't.

On the contrary, I'm a big believer in allowing academy players the opportunity to guest with other teams.  1. It provides extra touches and allows the player to work on their individual skill and 2. it provides the parents valuable insight into other teams coaches and parents.  

In this year leading up to select, we often see shakeups as players move, kids get cut and teams fold.  There are a number of variables that can lead your kid to be looking in from the outside.  Having a couple of teams you could go to and be happy is not a bad thing.  Everyone should have a backup plan!  Even if it is spending more time on the lake  Very Happy

Just had this conversation. I totally agree.
Ev23
Ev23
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 49
Points : 2979
Join date : 2013-10-29

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by TxKpr 14/08/14, 04:03 pm

There were several teams on PAL that borrowed players.  Not only did they borrow players to fill up roster, but borrow the better players to win.  

Personally I dont agree with this, but to each their own.  Very Happy Very Happy
TxKpr
TxKpr
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 95
Points : 2785
Join date : 2014-06-15

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Ev23 14/08/14, 04:08 pm

Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?
Ev23
Ev23
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 49
Points : 2979
Join date : 2013-10-29

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by TxKpr 14/08/14, 04:11 pm

50/50 Id say.
I can see the Cons and the Pros on both the Coaches and my DDs end.

TxKpr
TxKpr
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 95
Points : 2785
Join date : 2014-06-15

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Guest 14/08/14, 04:13 pm

Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Ev23 14/08/14, 04:15 pm

Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.
I meant your academy coach saying you can't play with anyone but him/her.
Ev23
Ev23
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 49
Points : 2979
Join date : 2013-10-29

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by tpitty 14/08/14, 04:20 pm

Ev23 wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.
I meant your academy coach saying you can't play with anyone but him/her.

Ask him/her why? There isn't a solid reason. It is youth academy. No contracts. Come U11 they have you, until then play for as many people as you can.

tpitty
TxSoccer Sponsor
TxSoccer Sponsor

Posts : 423
Points : 4563
Join date : 2010-07-29

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by FriscoSoccer2004 14/08/14, 04:26 pm

Ev23 wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.
I meant your academy coach saying you can't play with anyone but him/her.

My guess is the coach is insecure in his/her abilities and fears you may realize that there are better coaches/situations available for your daughter in the open market

FriscoSoccer2004
FriscoSoccer2004
TxSoccer Sponsor
TxSoccer Sponsor

Posts : 1785
Points : 6282
Join date : 2010-09-07
Location : planning my next grilling masterpiece

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Guest 14/08/14, 04:28 pm

FriscoSoccer05 wrote:
Ev23 wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.
I meant your academy coach saying you can't play with anyone but him/her.

My guess is the coach is insecure in his/her abilities and fears you may realize that there are better coaches/situations available for your daughter in the open market


Spot on assessment. The same coaches that say this are often the same coaches that will gladly take a top 3 player from any of the top teams in DFW to win a tournament.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by TatonkaBurger 14/08/14, 05:10 pm

Guest wrote:
FriscoSoccer05 wrote:
Ev23 wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.
I meant your academy coach saying you can't play with anyone but him/her.

My guess is the coach is insecure in his/her abilities and fears you may realize that there are better coaches/situations available for your daughter in the open market


Spot on assessment.  The same coaches that say this are often the same coaches that will gladly take a top 3 player from any of the top teams in DFW to win a tournament.

Yup.  We have a lot of those coaches in NTX.
TatonkaBurger
TatonkaBurger
TxSoccer Addict
TxSoccer Addict

Posts : 1176
Points : 4446
Join date : 2012-12-03

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Sweet_feet99 14/08/14, 06:57 pm

TatonkaBurger wrote:
Guest wrote:
FriscoSoccer05 wrote:
Ev23 wrote:
Yes!Yes!Yes! wrote:
Ev23 wrote:Just wondering. What's everyone's opinion on a coach "banning/requesting" your daughter from playing on any other team?

I wouldn't want to play for a coach that bans my kid anyways.  But if it's truly 'Academy' then they shouldn't be banning your child, unless your child was disruptive or insubordinate and they have substantial logged evidence to back their claim.
I meant your academy coach saying you can't play with anyone but him/her.

My guess is the coach is insecure in his/her abilities and fears you may realize that there are better coaches/situations available for your daughter in the open market


Spot on assessment.  The same coaches that say this are often the same coaches that will gladly take a top 3 player from any of the top teams in DFW to win a tournament.

Yup.  We have a lot of those coaches in NTX.

Oh wow, the old "you can't play for any other team but mine" shows insecurity in the coach. Went through this with my 04 a few years ago, got the green light from the director and was actually encouraged to check other teams out before select. Long story short, guest play as much as you like. By the time select comes around you will have a better idea on what type of coach, team that is best for your dd. If anything, do it for the extra touchs, gain experience playing different styles of the game.
Sweet_feet99
Sweet_feet99
TxSoccer Postmaster
TxSoccer Postmaster

Posts : 385
Points : 3803
Join date : 2012-07-14

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by banana kick 14/08/14, 08:42 pm

A clear advantage of academy is mobility, an advantage that becomes much more challenging after next June.

Did your coach explain why he/she would prefer you to play only with him/her? If not, ask. His/her response will likely tell you everything you need to know.
banana kick
banana kick
TxSoccer Postmaster
TxSoccer Postmaster

Posts : 178
Points : 3184
Join date : 2013-08-06

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Ev23 14/08/14, 08:50 pm

He said other academy coaches would "no doubt" take advantage of his (the coaches) hard work and receipt the player who is now more skillful as a direct result of his hard work. So he expects total commitment.
Obviously she will continue to play where I decide. But this policy seemed odd to me.
Ev23
Ev23
TxSoccer Poster
TxSoccer Poster

Posts : 49
Points : 2979
Join date : 2013-10-29

Back to top Go down

If the 05's qualified this year - Page 4 Empty Re: If the 05's qualified this year

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum