Player Pass UN-Scientific Forum Poll

[Tiki-taka]

Totally unscientific,  and not reliable due to the many visitors on here with multiple personality disorder, 'er aliases....

Above: Modified could mean many different versions: CPP restricted to only playing up in Division or age group,  or CPP must be executed 48 hours prior to date of game, and opposing team notified of roster change 48 hours prior to game,  or CPP can only be used X number of times per team, or CPP is shut off during last three games of each season (Fall and Spring).   These are just a few examples.

poll will run for 7 days.

[Tiki-taka]

Please vote in this poll versus that Soccer Chuck one, because this one is more un-scientific than Chuck's and because Chuck copied off my test paper in 4th grade, and still continues to copy me now even though I am approaching 63 yrs old. Only you can Stop the madness and bullying by Chuck.

[Havingfunyet]

I would say if it was revoked then we would have less teams with more on the roster. After age 13, I think this is a good idea due to injury and outside activities. By keeping it or modifiying it, then you will hae teams with not enough players having to borrow just to hang on. I beleive we have too many teams with not enough players in dfw already.

[SoccerDad2002]

I say MODIFY it for only playing "UP"...no playing down or across levels.

[ballhead]

I would say if it was revoked then we would have less teams with more on the roster.  After age 13, I think this is a good idea due to injury and outside activities.  By keeping it or modifiying it, then you will hae teams with not enough players having to borrow just to hang on.  I beleive we have too many teams with not enough players in dfw already.

My personal opinion is that there is zero change of CPP going away.  The rest of the country uses it, North Texas approved it, and both the girls and boys Classic Leagues have enabled it.

I believe LHGCL will look to tweak the rule after this year, probably in the area of playing up/down, but it isn't going away.

[CPPmustgoaway]

I would say if it was revoked then we would have less teams with more on the roster.  After age 13, I think this is a good idea due to injury and outside activities.  By keeping it or modifiying it, then you will hae teams with not enough players having to borrow just to hang on.  I beleive we have too many teams with not enough players in dfw already.

My personal opinion is that there is zero change of CPP going away.  The rest of the country uses it, North Texas approved it, and both the girls and boys Classic Leagues have enabled it.

I believe LHGCL will look to tweak the rule after this year, probably in the area of playing up/down, but it isn't going away.

No tweak, only repeal will work.

[Zizou]

No, making a few changes will better the rule and allow for players to play at higher levels.

[InaB]

CPP should be upward only. DII player to D1; DIII to DII or DI and DIII is left out unless we allow a PPL player to go upward to an LHGL DIII team.

[Sponsored content]