Latest topics
Log in
Be An Athletic Supporter!
Donate and get this nifty tag!
Statistics
We have 15805 registered usersThe newest registered user is markschmidt4
Our users have posted a total of 205176 messages in 31964 subjects
Signing Day!
Page 2 of 3 • Share
Page 2 of 3 • 
1, 2, 3
Re: Signing Day!
by OkieEnergyDad 08/02/18, 01:21 pm
I looked around. The ECNL website is incorrect. Katie is class of 2019. She has verbally committed to Texas A&M but she did not sign yesterday.
OkieEnergyDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 130
Join date : 2017-06-27
Re: Signing Day!
by OkieEnergyDad 08/02/18, 01:26 pm
Juliet Moncho also graduates from Casady as the class of 2019...This list does not seem accurate...
OkieEnergyDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 130
Points : 2633
Join date : 2017-06-27
Re: Signing Day!
by SoccerDad75070 08/02/18, 01:42 pm
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LJCR9n5AMpOoP1ZEbOQsKHE5F8idhmQvlV6aKNCGuV0/edit#gid=0
SoccerDad75070- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 51
Points : 3004
Join date : 2016-04-12
Re: Signing Day!
by TulsaFootballDad 08/02/18, 01:43 pm
Thnks for the info surprised they included it in the class of 2018 on the ECNL site.
TulsaFootballDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 109
Points : 2959
Join date : 2016-07-10
Re: Signing Day!
by OkieEnergyDad 08/02/18, 02:20 pm
Sounds like ECNL is cooking the books, trying to make their numbers better than they really are 
So this time next year, TSC will sign girls to Dartmouth and A&M again...lol
So this time next year, TSC will sign girls to Dartmouth and A&M again...lol
OkieEnergyDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 130
Points : 2633
Join date : 2017-06-27
Re: Signing Day!
by President Camacho 08/02/18, 02:53 pm
serious congrats to all that signed and those still making their decision.
President Camacho- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 135
Points : 2559
Join date : 2017-10-20
Re: Signing Day!
by Medicine Man 08/02/18, 03:37 pm
It's all fuzzy Okie just par for the course. Deception to fluff the marketing.
__________________________________________________
Pay to play isn't picky if you have cash money! There's always more spots to fill in the ponzi scheme. The layers keep expanding and the facts get skewed.
Watch "Frankie Goes To Hollywood - Relax (Laser Version)" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/rCp2h5jslKY
Medicine Man- TxSoccer Author
- Posts : 936
Points : 3400
Join date : 2017-09-29
Location : Purgatory
Re: Signing Day!
by TulsaFootballDad 08/02/18, 03:46 pm
Is there somwhere they have the GDA numbers on college signings from this initial year?
TulsaFootballDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 109
Points : 2959
Join date : 2016-07-10
Re: Signing Day!
by OkieEnergyDad 08/02/18, 05:46 pm
http://www.ussoccerda.com/20180208-news-academy-players-sign-off-on-college-commitments-for-fall-2018
OkieEnergyDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 130
Points : 2633
Join date : 2017-06-27
TulsaFootballDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 109
Points : 2959
Join date : 2016-07-10
Re: Signing Day!
by OkieEnergyDad 08/02/18, 09:12 pm
When I looked at the ECNL signing day list for Texas A&M signees only 1 of the 3 listed is correct. Looks like someone is trying to inflate their numbers. Wonder how many other programs they did this to...
OkieEnergyDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 130
Points : 2633
Join date : 2017-06-27
Re: Signing Day!
by 918soccer 09/02/18, 12:05 am
Comparing the DA and ECNL signing day numbers, anyone else surprised how many more ECNL girls signed? DA reported signing 1056 boys and girls and ECNL reported signing 1157 girls. That's a pretty big difference.
918soccer- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 67
Points : 2418
Join date : 2017-11-20
Re: Signing Day!
by 918soccer 09/02/18, 12:29 am
Okie - Looks like TSC accidentally listed Katie Smith as a signee instead of Katie Gasaway. I'm sure it was just a reporting error but Katie Gasaway did sign yesterday. Here is a list of current TSC signees.
https://www.jotformpro.com/table/80375237682058
https://www.jotformpro.com/table/80375237682058
918soccer- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 67
Points : 2418
Join date : 2017-11-20
Re: Signing Day!
by KeeperCommander 09/02/18, 07:13 am
I am shocked Sting Austin signed more that Sting Dallas.
KeeperCommander- TxSoccer Addict
- Posts : 1666
Points : 5563
Join date : 2013-09-30
Location : Sidelines watching practice
Re: Signing Day!
by Guest 09/02/18, 10:08 am
918soccer wrote:Comparing the DA and ECNL signing day numbers, anyone else surprised how many more ECNL girls signed? DA reported signing 1056 boys and girls and ECNL reported signing 1157 girls. That's a pretty big difference.
Not really suprising. This is the inaugural season for DA on the girls side. I would guess that most of your older girls who already had offers, stayed ECNL. It doesn't make sense to go DA for them. The younger age groups is where you will see the trend shift. I would look at and follow the 03's as the litmus test.
Guest- Guest
Re: Signing Day!
by AngelinaGoalee 09/02/18, 11:27 am
Cleansheets wrote:918soccer wrote:Comparing the DA and ECNL signing day numbers, anyone else surprised how many more ECNL girls signed? DA reported signing 1056 boys and girls and ECNL reported signing 1157 girls. That's a pretty big difference.
Not really suprising. This is the inaugural season for DA on the girls side. I would guess that most of your older girls who already had offers, stayed ECNL. It doesn't make sense to go DA for them. The younger age groups is where you will see the trend shift. I would look at and follow the 03's as the litmus test.
Right!!
Give it a few years.....
AngelinaGoalee- TxSoccer Author
- Posts : 608
Points : 4159
Join date : 2014-10-03
Re: Signing Day!
by KeeperCommander 09/02/18, 11:34 am
Would agree that it will take a bit of time for the girls to even out. 03’s might be the perfect year or even the 02’s for it to happen. However why is the boys number low? They had plenty of years.AngelinaGoalee wrote:Cleansheets wrote:918soccer wrote:Comparing the DA and ECNL signing day numbers, anyone else surprised how many more ECNL girls signed? DA reported signing 1056 boys and girls and ECNL reported signing 1157 girls. That's a pretty big difference.
Not really suprising. This is the inaugural season for DA on the girls side. I would guess that most of your older girls who already had offers, stayed ECNL. It doesn't make sense to go DA for them. The younger age groups is where you will see the trend shift. I would look at and follow the 03's as the litmus test.
Right!!
Give it a few years.....
KeeperCommander- TxSoccer Addict
- Posts : 1666
Points : 5563
Join date : 2013-09-30
Location : Sidelines watching practice
Re: Signing Day!
by Zizou 09/02/18, 11:47 am
KeeperCommander wrote:Would agree that it will take a bit of time for the girls to even out. 03’s might be the perfect year or even the 02’s for it to happen. However why is the boys number low? They had plenty of years.AngelinaGoalee wrote:Cleansheets wrote:918soccer wrote:Comparing the DA and ECNL signing day numbers, anyone else surprised how many more ECNL girls signed? DA reported signing 1056 boys and girls and ECNL reported signing 1157 girls. That's a pretty big difference.
Not really suprising. This is the inaugural season for DA on the girls side. I would guess that most of your older girls who already had offers, stayed ECNL. It doesn't make sense to go DA for them. The younger age groups is where you will see the trend shift. I would look at and follow the 03's as the litmus test.
Right!!
Give it a few years.....
The boys have more options that committing to a college. Some might have taken a pro contract.
Zizou- TxSoccer Spammer
- Posts : 2433
Points : 6363
Join date : 2013-11-09
918soccer- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 67
Points : 2418
Join date : 2017-11-20
AngelinaGoalee- TxSoccer Author
- Posts : 608
Points : 4159
Join date : 2014-10-03
Re: Signing Day!
by 918soccer 09/02/18, 02:50 pm
KeeperCommander wrote:Would agree that it will take a bit of time for the girls to even out. 03’s might be the perfect year or even the 02’s for it to happen. However why is the boys number low? They had plenty of years.AngelinaGoalee wrote:Cleansheets wrote:918soccer wrote:Comparing the DA and ECNL signing day numbers, anyone else surprised how many more ECNL girls signed? DA reported signing 1056 boys and girls and ECNL reported signing 1157 girls. That's a pretty big difference.
Not really suprising. This is the inaugural season for DA on the girls side. I would guess that most of your older girls who already had offers, stayed ECNL. It doesn't make sense to go DA for them. The younger age groups is where you will see the trend shift. I would look at and follow the 03's as the litmus test.
Right!!
Give it a few years.....
I agree KC and I was anticipating ECNL to have higher numbers this year, but I didn't expect them to sign twice as many girls or for Sting Austin to sign more players than DA teams their first year in ECNL. That throws me for a loop and really makes me question the college recruiting differences between both programs.
918soccer- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 67
Points : 2418
Join date : 2017-11-20
Re: Signing Day!
by SkeetsG06 09/02/18, 03:52 pm
Congrats to all of the dds who will play at the next level and to their parents for all of the support to make the next level possible! Awesome accomplishment!!
SkeetsG06- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 182
Points : 3735
Join date : 2014-08-19
Re: Signing Day!
by lulu22 11/02/18, 06:46 am
SoccerDad75070 wrote:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LJCR9n5AMpOoP1ZEbOQsKHE5F8idhmQvlV6aKNCGuV0/edit#gid=0
Wow. PDA has some smart girls. That is an impressive list of colleges that the PDA girls are attending.
lulu22- TxSoccer Poster
- Posts : 42
Points : 3675
Join date : 2014-05-29
Re: Signing Day!
by Gunners 11/02/18, 01:13 pm
a) Fewer places for boys to play college soccer hence fewer commitments. See: Title IX
b) There are commits on that list who are not committed to play soccer where listed, but rather just attending college at the listed university. My guess is clubs are purposely overstating commits, but who knows.
c) PDA is arguably the best club in the country and pulls from some of the most affluent areas in the country. Do the math.
d) Congrats to the commits. You parents enjoy it! It goes by fast!
b) There are commits on that list who are not committed to play soccer where listed, but rather just attending college at the listed university. My guess is clubs are purposely overstating commits, but who knows.
c) PDA is arguably the best club in the country and pulls from some of the most affluent areas in the country. Do the math.
d) Congrats to the commits. You parents enjoy it! It goes by fast!
__________________________________________________
I got 99 problems but the pitch ain't one
Gunners- TxSoccer Addict
- Posts : 1292
Points : 6806
Join date : 2009-05-04
Location : Looking for The Situation
Re: Signing Day!
by HomeStretch 11/02/18, 01:34 pm
Gunners wrote:
b) There are commits on that list who are not committed to play soccer where listed, but rather just attending college at the listed university. My guess is clubs are purposely overstating commits, but who knows.
I did some analysis on this where I cross checked fall rosters with supposed "commits" listed publicly on Google doc sheet and other public sources. The delta was substantial for the class I checked. Either a ton of girls change their minds before freshman year or this overstating of athletic commits has been going on for quite a while.
HomeStretch- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 120
Points : 2906
Join date : 2016-09-19
Re: Signing Day!
by OkieEnergyDad 11/02/18, 03:08 pm
HomeStretch wrote:Gunners wrote:
b) There are commits on that list who are not committed to play soccer where listed, but rather just attending college at the listed university. My guess is clubs are purposely overstating commits, but who knows.
I did some analysis on this where I cross checked fall rosters with supposed "commits" listed publicly on Google doc sheet and other public sources. The delta was substantial for the class I checked. Either a ton of girls change their minds before freshman year or this overstating of athletic commits has been going on for quite a while.
So the data you analyzed was girls ECNL since this was the first season of girls DA correct?
OkieEnergyDad- TxSoccer Postmaster
- Posts : 130
Points : 2633
Join date : 2017-06-27
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topicsPage 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
