National Elite Prep Showcase

my2cents wrote:

bigtex75081 wrote:

Uncle Numanga wrote:Poor Palo Duro. Long way to come to be treated so badly.

Those results were harsh.

But what's the proper etiquette for scoring goals in a showcase tournament? A coach shouldn't try to run up a score but if you force your kids to stop scoring goals in a showcase tournament, where scouts should be there watching the game, are you really hurting your kids by making them stop? I know there are other ways to show skill during a game but nothing turns heads faster than a ball in the back of a net. Let's say you have a girl that wants a scholarship but hasn't gotten interest yet. Shouldn't you let her score 6 goals while recruiters are watching if she has that ability?What's the correct etiquette for these coaches?

No college coach is going to be impressed with six goals on what must be the equivelant of an open net. That is just unfortunate to be in a showcase against a team so mismatched. Most scouts will just walk away because there is no way to judge a player's quality unless there are one or two stars on the losing team that they are interesed in.

MaggieMaggie wrote:National Elite Prep Showcase


1) Carrol HS
2) Marcus HS
3) Keller HS
4) Boyd HS
5) Ursuline Academy
6) Flower Mound HS
7) Bishop Lynch
Hockaday
9) Plano West HS
10) Coppell HS
11) Nolan
12) The Colony
13) Rosary
14) St. Thomas Aquinas
15) Westlake HS
16) Georgetown
17) Monterrey
18) San Angelo Central
19) Allen HS
20) St. Stephens
21) Kingswood
22) Tyler Lee
23) American Heritage-Delray
24) Grapevine HS
25) Colleyville Heritage
26) Midland
27) Clear Lake
28) Arlington Martin
29) Antonian
30) Palo Duro
31) Murrieta Valley
32) Amarillo

u95g dad wrote:

MaggieMaggie wrote:National Elite Prep Showcase


1) Carrol HS
2) Marcus HS
3) Keller HS
4) Boyd HS
5) Ursuline Academy
6) Flower Mound HS
7) Bishop Lynch
Hockaday
9) Plano West HS
10) Coppell HS
11) Nolan
12) The Colony
13) Rosary
14) St. Thomas Aquinas
15) Westlake HS
16) Georgetown
17) Monterrey
18) San Angelo Central
19) Allen HS
20) St. Stephens
21) Kingswood
22) Tyler Lee
23) American Heritage-Delray
24) Grapevine HS
25) Colleyville Heritage
26) Midland
27) Clear Lake
28) Arlington Martin
29) Antonian
30) Palo Duro
31) Murrieta Valley
32) Amarillo

Is this your idea of the rankings from the teams involved? If so, I would say #32 was better than #30. Amarillo was competitive against some good competition. I also think Grapevine would be ranked higher.

JeffM wrote:

u95g dad wrote:

MaggieMaggie wrote:National Elite Prep Showcase


1) Carrol HS
2) Marcus HS
3) Keller HS
4) Boyd HS
5) Ursuline Academy
6) Flower Mound HS
7) Bishop Lynch
Hockaday
9) Plano West HS
10) Coppell HS
11) Nolan
12) The Colony
13) Rosary
14) St. Thomas Aquinas
15) Westlake HS
16) Georgetown
17) Monterrey
18) San Angelo Central
19) Allen HS
20) St. Stephens
21) Kingswood
22) Tyler Lee
23) American Heritage-Delray
24) Grapevine HS
25) Colleyville Heritage
26) Midland
27) Clear Lake
28) Arlington Martin
29) Antonian
30) Palo Duro
31) Murrieta Valley
32) Amarillo

Is this your idea of the rankings from the teams involved? If so, I would say #32 was better than #30. Amarillo was competitive against some good competition. I also think Grapevine would be ranked higher.

It is how they finished in the tournament per SportsMobility.net

http://sportsmobility.net/

MaggieMaggie wrote:

JeffM wrote:

u95g dad wrote:

MaggieMaggie wrote:National Elite Prep Showcase


1) Carrol HS
2) Marcus HS
3) Keller HS
4) Boyd HS
5) Ursuline Academy
6) Flower Mound HS
7) Bishop Lynch
Hockaday
9) Plano West HS
10) Coppell HS
11) Nolan
12) The Colony
13) Rosary
14) St. Thomas Aquinas
15) Westlake HS
16) Georgetown
17) Monterrey
18) San Angelo Central
19) Allen HS
20) St. Stephens
21) Kingswood
22) Tyler Lee
23) American Heritage-Delray
24) Grapevine HS
25) Colleyville Heritage
26) Midland
27) Clear Lake
28) Arlington Martin
29) Antonian
30) Palo Duro
31) Murrieta Valley
32) Amarillo

Is this your idea of the rankings from the teams involved? If so, I would say #32 was better than #30. Amarillo was competitive against some good competition. I also think Grapevine would be ranked higher.

It is how they finished in the tournament per SportsMobility.net

http://sportsmobility.net/

Correct, copied this off of sportsmobility site. BL is in a rebuilding phase with many freshman/sophmores on varsity. They played 3 of their games well but were dominated by FM during that game. Poor passes and got beat to the ball too much. Still very proud of their overall showing and ability to rally back after the FM game.