'05 Girls FBR Rankings - 9-16-14

Here is an attempt to give another data point on the ranking system. Strength of Schedule for the CFBAL Platinum 11v11 as a comparison with the FBRs rankings. This is based on the latest 9/16 Ranking. Since Texans Farley is not ranked yet and lost so handily to Pulp (8-0), I picked an arbitrary ranking of #20 for them (might be too high). One thing stands out is Pulp’s ease of schedule for the Fall. The total in ( ) is the added total of the rankings for all opponents being played this season.

1. D’Feeters Colon (55)
2. Solar Abbott (58)
3. Sting Parsons (64)
4. RUSH Voutier (65)
5. Hyypia (66)
6. Lady Aztecs (72)
7. Sting Diaz (73)
8. Texans Farley (76)
9. FC Dallas Hanlon (78)
10. Sting Scarfone (84)
11. Liverpool Gerrard (86)
12. Solar Pulp (87)

Ummm, has this been approved by BW?

Don't need my approval for anything. Have at it.

SoccerAdvice2Go wrote:Here is an attempt to give another data point on the ranking system.  Strength of Schedule for the CFBAL Platinum 11v11 as a comparison with the FBRs rankings.  This is based on the latest 9/16 Ranking.  Since Texans Farley is not ranked yet and lost so handily to Pulp (8-0), I picked an arbitrary ranking of #20 for them (might be too high).  One thing stands out  is Pulp’s ease of schedule for the Fall.  The total in ( ) is the added total of the rankings for all opponents being played this season.

1. D’Feeters Colon  (55)
2. Solar Abbott  (58)
3. Sting Parsons (64)
4. RUSH Voutier  (65)
5. Hyypia (66)
6. Lady Aztecs (72)
7. Sting Diaz (73)
8. Texans Farley (76)
9. FC Dallas Hanlon (78)
10. Sting Scarfone  (84)
11. Liverpool Gerrard  (86)
12. Solar Pulp (87)

I think this is scuwed to favor the lower ranked teams. 1-5 can't play themselves and can only play eachother so many times. This logic penalizes the higher ranked teams 1-5. Guess it all depends on how BW weights his formula. Think that's why the tier system is in place.