02 Keepers

Any team in the top 15 looking for a keeper?

sj200 wrote:Any team in the top 15 looking for a keeper?

What if the team is 16-20 and could be a top 15 with a keeper? Or for that matter... 20-30 and could challenge into the top 15 with the right keeper?

sj200 wrote:Any team in the top 15 looking for a keeper?

Sting Parker is in that 15 - 22 range and looking:
https://www.txsoccer.net/t10335-goal-keeper-needed-sting-02-parker

Solar Stark is also in that 15 - 22 range and looking:
https://www.txsoccer.net/t10229-red-rover-red-rover-send-a-keeper-right-over

Keeper play is pretty critical. Agree with Bierluva than good keeper moves a team 5+ slots often enough. If you land on any team ranked above 25, you are a very good bet to make Lake Highlands during QT.

javajake wrote:

sj200 wrote:Any team in the top 15 looking for a keeper?

Sting Parker is in that 15 - 22 range and looking:
https://www.txsoccer.net/t10335-goal-keeper-needed-sting-02-parker

Solar Stark is also in that 15 - 22 range and looking:
https://www.txsoccer.net/t10229-red-rover-red-rover-send-a-keeper-right-over

Keeper play is pretty critical. Agree with Bierluva than good keeper moves a team 5+ slots often enough. If you land on any team ranked above 25, you are a very good bet to make Lake Highlands during QT.

I believe the Southlake Saints also posted looking and Polaris did a few weeks back which is of course now FCD Rangel.

Solar Barnes in top 15 looking
https://www.txsoccer.net/t10390-solar-chelsea-east-02g-looking-for-keeper

Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

PM me for info on GK Skill Training and Game prep - one of our GK families is relocating... Rare Opp!
THANKS!

www.saints-soccer.org

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Bump

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

pro16 wrote:

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

I agree with the older teams (when roster expands to 18) that most have two keepers. I was only referring to the first year of select.

nukem wrote:

pro16 wrote:

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

I agree with the older teams (when roster expands to 18) that most have two keepers. I was only referring to the first year of select.

Understood.

But here in lies my point...."first year of select". Don't get me wrong, I get it. But I don't necessarily agree with it.
I think it's good foresight on a coaches part and i think it's a quality developmental philosophy.

I am a former collegiate scout and in my industry we see too often that players get pawned at an early age.

nukem wrote:

pro16 wrote:

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

I agree with the older teams (when roster expands to 18) that most have two keepers. I was only referring to the first year of select.

I think this fits into the discussions on this forum regarding whether club soccer practices actually promote the best development of young players. For example - putting 10 year olds on full size - 11 v 11 fields. Coaches are under pressure to play their U10's and U9's in 11 v 11 to get them ready for U11.

Seems like carrying 2 keepers at the younger age levels actually makes more sense than when they are older.

Sent to the Stands wrote:

nukem wrote:

pro16 wrote:

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

I agree with the older teams (when roster expands to 18) that most have two keepers. I was only referring to the first year of select.

I think this fits into the discussions on this forum regarding whether club soccer practices actually promote the best development of young players. For example - putting 10 year olds on full size - 11 v 11 fields. Coaches are under pressure to play their U10's and U9's in 11 v 11 to get them ready for U11.

Seems like carrying 2 keepers at the younger age levels actually makes more sense than when they are older.

...but the older you get, the less time you get on the field to develop that part of your game....thus, my support for dual keepers at a younger age. The older you get, the less likely you are to play keep and field.

pro16 wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

nukem wrote:

pro16 wrote:

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

I agree with the older teams (when roster expands to 18) that most have two keepers. I was only referring to the first year of select.

I think this fits into the discussions on this forum regarding whether club soccer practices actually promote the best development of young players. For example - putting 10 year olds on full size - 11 v 11 fields. Coaches are under pressure to play their U10's and U9's in 11 v 11 to get them ready for U11.

Seems like carrying 2 keepers at the younger age levels actually makes more sense than when they are older.

...but the older you get, the less time you get on the field to develop that part of your game....thus, my support for dual keepers at a younger age. The older you get, the less likely you are to play keep and field.

That's what I was trying to say. Makes more sense when they are younger, because they can get experience doing both while they are still growing and developing.

Sent to the Stands wrote:

pro16 wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

nukem wrote:

pro16 wrote:

nukem wrote:

Sent to the Stands wrote:

oldboot wrote:

pro16 wrote:Sting Parker yes.
In fact, looking for two starter quality keepers.
Coach is going for dual keepers in order to develop them on the field so their awareness, intellect, skill can put them in a position to be completely well-rounded as a player/keeper for the future when it matters most.

One down, one to go.

PM for info.

Why are 2 better than 1? Seems like most teams only want 1.

From a developmental standpoint, it's probably the best thing for your goal keeper daughter. At 10 or 11 yrs of age, she's still growing. Keeper may be the place for her today, but that may change. Personally, I'd rather see my daughter develop in the field as well.

That is good thinking in theory and I do agree with it but I did not see a coach change keepers in a D1 LHGCL game this year except once when the score was beyond question. And this change was made with 15 minutes remaining in the game. A field player was put in goal, not a second keeper. If you polled the top 30 '01 teams I think you will find only 1 keeper on the rosters.

May or not be accurate assessment on which teams did or didn't. However, the higher level you play and the older you get, 2 keepers are very standard to most if not all rosters. It's a very common practice, it's just that most coaches at this age are too afraid to take the risk because they feel the pressure and need to win today, and tend to sacrifice player development in the long term in order to see fruit in the short term. Been down that road...both sides.

I agree with the older teams (when roster expands to 18) that most have two keepers. I was only referring to the first year of select.

I think this fits into the discussions on this forum regarding whether club soccer practices actually promote the best development of young players. For example - putting 10 year olds on full size - 11 v 11 fields. Coaches are under pressure to play their U10's and U9's in 11 v 11 to get them ready for U11.

Seems like carrying 2 keepers at the younger age levels actually makes more sense than when they are older.

...but the older you get, the less time you get on the field to develop that part of your game....thus, my support for dual keepers at a younger age. The older you get, the less likely you are to play keep and field.

That's what I was trying to say. Makes more sense when they are younger, because they can get experience doing both while they are still growing and developing.

gotcha

Interesting article from Soccer America on this very topic:

Field Play Make Better Keepers

http://www.socceramerica.com/article/30861/youth-beat-field-play-makes-better-keepers.html


"DiCicco, Wheddon, Mulqueen and Grafer all agree that playing in the field is crucial for a goalkeeper's development. And that keepers who specialize too early, even if they've mastered most aspects of the position, may find themselves losing out to keepers who had more experience in the field when they reach higher levels.

"Foot skills still seem to be lacking overall in the goalkeeping department," Wheddon says. "I think at the youth level, we often pigeon-hole players very, very early. OK, you're a goalkeeper, you're 7 years old. It's unfortunate that we do label kids so early. And we don't develop their foot skills enough from an early age onward."

The article:

Is the USA's ability to produce great goalkeepers threatened by early specialization?

In high school, goalkeepers Brad Friedel and Tim Howard starred at soccer and basketball. Tony Meola kept playing baseball even at the University at Virginia while he was starring in goal and launching a national team career that would include to two World Cup appearances.

Gold-medalist goalkeeper Hope Solo played basketball and volleyball, in addition to soccer, at which she played forward until converting to full-time goalkeeper in college.

In fact, Solo scored 109 goals in high school, leading to her Parade All-American selection twice as a field player. She's similar to Meola and Howard in that way. They too played forward for their high school teams and were prolific scorers.

Brad Guzan, the backup keeper to Howard with the U.S. national team, was a consistent starter in MLS at a younger age than any previous keeper before he moved to the English Premier League. Guzan played in the field for his youth club, the Chicago Magic, and Providence Catholic High School, where he earned all-state honors as a midfielder.

It would seem, then, that playing other sports and other positions in soccer might be beneficial to a goalkeeper's development. But whether that's the path the future American keepers take may be threatened by the ultra-competitive environment of today's youth game.

"A lot of coaches worry that a player is going to fall behind if he doesn't play goalkeeper all the time," says U.S. Soccer goalkeeper coach Tim Mulqueen "I don't agree with that."

Mulqueen, who has coached U.S. keepers at the U-17 and U-20 World Cups and the Olympics, says playing other sports and playing other positions on the soccer field is an important part of a player's development.

"There needs to be a healthy balance," he says. "If the kids play soccer the whole time, they can obviously suffer from burnout. For me, the correlation between playing soccer and basketball, baseball or lacrosse - to me that makes a whole lot of sense. Besides there being skills that translate over to soccer for goalkeeping, it keeps them fresh mentally. It keeps their body fresh. It's a win-win for me."

Paul Grafer is the current goalkeeper coach for the U-17 boys national team. Before he took that position he spent three years studying youth sports trends in America at Adelphi University.

"The movement to have the youth soccer player specialize at an even earlier age ... I'd say that's consistent among all sports," says Grafer. "Every sport is trying to garner as many kids as possible, so specialization is an issue for every sport."

This early specializing has become one of American youth sports' most controversial issues. For one, studies have shown that it could be the reason for an increase in "overuse injuries" among children.

"Many theories abound but most experts point to one main causative factor: year-round training in a single sport," says Dr. Dev K. Mishra, an orthopedic surgeon and member of the team physician pool with the U.S. Soccer Federation. "What we are talking about here is structured, organized training. I cannot recall seeing these injuries in kids playing pickup soccer, hanging out at the park or even playing several 'seasonal' sports."

Some youth clubs expect even preteens to dedicate themselves year-round to a single sport. One motivation for this could be that paid coaches need year-round income, although they'll say it's because children must specialize to excel. However, other coaches believe that a varied experience turns them into better athletes, which will help them when they do eventually specialize.

Tony DiCicco, a goalkeeper coach who was head coach of the U.S. women's 1996 Olympic and 1999 World Cup triumphs, is head coach of Women's Professional Soccer's Boston Breakers.

"I think there may very well be less exploring of other sports by children today," says DiCicco. "I'm not saying that's right or wrong, but personally I think that playing a variety of sports, especially for preteens and even in the early teens, is very good for you. And it's especially good for goalkeepers to play sports like basketball and baseball because of hand-eye coordination."

DiCicco said when he coached U-10s, he would rotate keepers, giving almost all of them stints in goal. Even at the U-13 level, he says half his players took turns in goal.

Solo says the No. 1 question she gets from parents is about choosing a single sport for their children at an early age.

"They'll say, 'I want my daughter to focus on one sport,'" Solo says. "I guess it's because in this day and age, parents want their kids to get further along as fast as possible, so they can get a scholarship. But I don't know if that's good. If I had played the same sport the entire year, I know I would have gotten burned out."

As a youth player, Solo rarely played goalkeeper. She says that if she had started playing only keeper at a young age, it would have turned her off soccer. She says that playing in the field helped her agility, her reading of the game and her foot skills, which Olympic team goalkeeper coach Phil Wheddon says are extraordinary.

"It wasn't until I was an adult that I could really appreciate the qualities of being goalkeeper," Solo says.

DiCicco, Wheddon, Mulqueen and Grafer all agree that playing in the field is crucial for a goalkeeper's development. And that keepers who specialize too early, even if they've mastered most aspects of the position, may find themselves losing out to keepers who had more experience in the field when they reach higher levels.

"Foot skills still seem to be lacking overall in the goalkeeping department," Wheddon says. "I think at the youth level, we often pigeon-hole players very, very early. OK, you're a goalkeeper, you're 7 years old. It's unfortunate that we do label kids so early. And we don't develop their foot skills enough from an early age onward."

While the success of Kasey Keller, Marcus Hahnemann, Howard and Friedel in the English Premier League indicates the USA produces excellent goalkeepers, Grafer says there are general deficiencies that he sees in American keepers when he scouts for the U-17 national team program.

"We do have good goalkeepers," Grafer says. "We tend to make a lot of great saves, deal great with crosses and are courageous. But when it comes to foot skills, distribution, communication and organization of the team - the tactical areas and positioning - I'm not sure we match up as well as we could with keepers from other parts of the world.

"Understanding where the danger spots are. Cutting out through balls and that organizational part that is almost like preventive goalkeeping - where you don't even have to make that emergency save - those are skills that players can develop by playing in the field."

Which is why the national team keeper coaches advocate that youth coaches shouldn't encourage youngsters to specialize too early.

"I think our keepers tend to specialize fairly early," says Grafer. "Some people say it shouldn't be until age 14. I don't know if there's any real rule, but we'd like the young goalkeepers to also be playing in the field."
(This article originally appeared in the February 2009 issue of Soccer America magazine.)

Maybe Sting coach Parker knows what he is doing

It would be nice to know where (town/city) these teams looking for keepers practice. It would help those parents know if that team is in their area.

lovesoccer wrote:It would be nice to know where (town/city) these teams looking for keepers practice. It would help those parents know if that team is in their area.

Sting02 Parker practices at Moss Park - Monday's and Wednesdays 5:30 - 7:00
8000 Greenville Ave. (btwn Royal & Walnut Hill), Dallas, TX 75231

It all sounds good and might work as long as both keeps are close to each other in skill and effectiveness. If one does much better than the other, pressure cooker starts. Coach starts second guessing the plan. Big games will be on agenda. Parents put pressure to win in Lake Highlands especially if at bottom on the relegation zone. Other parents don't dig keepers in the field if they think they are some of the weaker field players they have. It does take time away from normal field players which results in more unhappiness. I agree that foot skills are important for development but development is not the only agenda item in NTX soccer. This will get complicated. Any coach trying to keep 16 or more players in enough minutes knows it. There is a reason the rotation gets shorter in the NBA playoffs. Same here.

dirknowitzki wrote:It all sounds good and might work as long as both keeps are close to each other in skill and effectiveness. If one does much better than the other, pressure cooker starts. Coach starts second guessing the plan. Big games will be on agenda. Parents put pressure to win in Lake Highlands especially if at bottom on the relegation zone. Other parents don't dig keepers in the field if they think they are some of the weaker field players they have. It does take time away from normal field players which results in more unhappiness. I agree that foot skills are important for development but development is not the only agenda item in NTX soccer. This will get complicated. Any coach trying to keep 16 or more players in enough minutes knows it. There is a reason the rotation gets shorter in the NBA playoffs. Same here.

You are assuming all coaches crack under the "pressure cooker" idea. There are some excellent coaches on NTX who have a bigger picture in mind and parents either will or won't buy in. It's up to coach and families to be on the same page then for coach to manage and follow through with the plan. One would have to trust the coach to follow through accordingly.